Solutions and Asylum Procedures


After the COVID-19 pandemic halted many asylum procedures around Europe, new technologies have become reviving these kinds of systems. Coming from lie diagnosis tools analyzed at the edge to a system for confirming documents and transcribes interviews, a wide range of systems is being made use of in asylum applications. This article explores find more how these technology have reshaped the ways asylum procedures happen to be conducted. It reveals how asylum seekers are transformed into obligated hindered techno-users: They are asked to comply with a series of techno-bureaucratic steps and keep up with capricious tiny within criteria and deadlines. This obstructs the capacity to steer these systems and to follow their right for protection.

It also displays how these kinds of technologies are embedded in refugee governance: They assist in the ‘circuits of financial-humanitarianism’ that function through a whirlwind of spread technological requirements. These requirements increase asylum seekers’ socio-legal precarity simply by hindering all of them from opening the stations of safeguards. It further argues that analyses of securitization and victimization should be coupled with an insight in to the disciplinary mechanisms worth mentioning technologies, through which migrants happen to be turned into data-generating subjects who also are regimented by their reliability on technology.

Drawing on Foucault’s notion of power/knowledge and comarcal knowledge, the article states that these solutions have an natural obstructiveness. They have a double impact: while they assist with expedite the asylum process, they also produce it difficult pertaining to refugees to navigate these types of systems. They are really positioned in a ‘knowledge deficit’ that makes all of them vulnerable to bogus decisions created by non-governmental celebrities, and ill-informed and unreliable narratives about their instances. Moreover, that they pose fresh risks of’machine mistakes’ that may result in inaccurate or discriminatory outcomes.